Procurement of Research Evaluation Consultant

SAT-7 and Right to Play are calling available research consultants and companies to register their interest to be involved in the evaluation of this project.

The scope of this impact evaluation is to assess the extent to which the project is successfully pursuing its intended outcomes and objective. Evaluative research is conducted to determine how much influence the project has had on those who have engaged with it, including the child participants, viewers, communities, and duty bearers. It seeks to discover if there has been any association between exposure to outputs and changes in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours. The evaluation is done in co-operation with the project partners and will include triangulation of the internal monitoring and research findings.

Please refer to Annex 1 at the end of this document for more information on the project evaluation framework.

Target group

Children aged 10-15 years of various religious or belief groups within Lebanon, inclusive of Lebanese, Armenians, Syrians, Palestinians, Iraqi and Egyptian.  

Methodology

Methodology of evaluation will be developed by the evaluator. The evaluator will be provided with access to the contents of the television program and on social media, social media statistics, to do interviews with implementing partners, participants, viewers and other stakeholders, and to the internal monitoring and evaluation reports including pre- and post-activity surveys.

Objectives

• To what extend has the project contributed to the participating and viewing children’s commitment to universal values?
• To what extend has the project increased the participants’ and viewers’ willingness to seek out and maintain connections with other demographics from whom they differ ethnically, socially, or religiously?
• To what extent has the project impacted the participants’ and viewers’ willingness to collaborate across social divisions engaging in shared advocacy initiatives strengthening civic engagement?

Learning

• What made the change happen? What was the contribution of the project to the change? What other factors contributed to change?
• What strategies and activities worked well and why? Which ones did not and why?
• Are there expected changes that did not happen? If so, why have they not happened?
• Are there unexpected changes that happened? If so, why did they happen?
• What lessons have been learned from implementing the work? How can these lessons be applied to future work?
• What should be done differently in the future based on the learning from the evaluation in similar or related projects?

  SAT-7 and Right to Play are calling available research consultants and companies to register their interest to be involved in the evaluation of this project.

   

  The scope of this impact evaluation is to assess the extent to which the project is successfully pursuing its intended outcomes and objective. Evaluative research is conducted to determine how much influence the project has had on those who have engaged with it, including the child participants, viewers, communities, and duty bearers. It seeks to discover if there has been any association between exposure to outputs and changes in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours. The evaluation is done in co-operation with the project partners and will include triangulation of the internal monitoring and research findings.

   

  Please refer to Annex 1 at the end of this document for more information on the project evaluation framework.

  Target group

  Children aged 10-15 years of various religious or belief groups within Lebanon, inclusive of Lebanese, Armenians, Syrians, Palestinians, Iraqi and Egyptian.  

  Methodology

  Methodology of evaluation will be developed by the evaluator. The evaluator will be provided with access to the contents of the television program and on social media, social media statistics, to do interviews with implementing partners, participants, viewers and other stakeholders, and to the internal monitoring and evaluation reports including pre- and post-activity surveys.

   

  Examples of guiding question for evaluation:

   

  Objectives

• To what extend has the project contributed to the participating and viewing children’s commitment to universal values?
• To what extend has the project increased the participants’ and viewers’ willingness to seek out and maintain connections with other demographics from whom they differ ethnically, socially, or religiously?
• To what extent has the project impacted the participants’ and viewers’ willingness to collaborate across social divisions engaging in shared advocacy initiatives strengthening civic engagement?

• Learning

• What made the change happen? What was the contribution of the project to the change? What other factors contributed to change?
• What strategies and activities worked well and why? Which ones did not and why?
• Are there expected changes that did not happen? If so, why have they not happened?
• Are there unexpected changes that happened? If so, why did they happen?
• What lessons have been learned from implementing the work? How can these lessons be applied to future work?
• What should be done differently in the future based on the learning from the evaluation in similar or related projects?